Mob Programming Retrospectives


One nice thing with mobbing is that it’s easy to have meetings. The team wanted a retrospective yesterday, so we all moved to a room and had a quick meeting.

We used a Lean Coffee format last time. This time we tried a Sail-Anchor format (what blows us forwards, what drags us back). 

There were two main groups for each. 

What pushes us forwards:
  • Behaviour in the mob.
  • Good coding practices.
Socialising more has increased morale. The mob in general seems more cohesive. Dropping in and out has become more normal. 

For coding practices, we’ve been focussing on small well-defined tasks, small simple functions, and writing good Scenarios. 

What drags us back:
  • Behaviour in the mob.
  • The codebase and tools.
The unhelpful behaviour was a mix of not following good mob practices, criticising code written by others, and meandering off course down rabbit holes in the code. 

To help, we agreed that we’d check if a rabbit hole was worth following at the end of each turn driving. And anyone can raise their hand to ask for silence if they spot us behaving badly. 

For the codebase and the tools, we just have to keep learning. 

All in half an hour :-)

We’ll have another one in the next couple of weeks. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SoCraTes UK 2024 trip report

In September 2024 I attended my second SoCraTes conference, and once again, it was enlightening and fun. There are two formal parts to the conference - a training day, and then two days for the unconference. I say formal parts, because there are plenty of informal sessions as well. One of the great things about SoCrcaTes is that we all stay at the same hotel, so there is loads of opportunities for social interaction. You meet people at breakfast, you maybe go for a walk with other people, there are board games and music sessions in the evenings... It's a strange mixture of really intense and very relaxing! There's a lovely Italian Garden at the hotel, which is a very nice place to sit and chat: SoCraTes has a pretty strong XP focus, but there are plenty of non-technical discussions and workshops too.  The day before This year, the conference was at Milton House Hotel just outside Didcot in Oxfordshire. So on the day before the conference, I took the train from Edinburgh to Lon...
Read more

We always start from where we are

Image
Earlier on in this year, I had a really interesting discussion online with Duncan Hothersall about Scottish Independence, and Brexit. I support independence, and Duncan very much doesn't. Scotland is currently about evenly split between supporters and opponents of independence, with a small number of hardcore unionists and nationalists on either side. But many people are in the middle, and weigh up the decision based on the perceived pros and cons. In itself, this disagreement between Duncan and myself is interesting. We share a similar world-view and similar hopes for the future. We agree in many ways on the kind of future we would like to see. But we disagree on how we want to get there.  This is of course a common pattern. We often share a purpose with other people, but we disagree on the tactics or maybe even the strategy for how to achieve it, and there is a wealth of literature on how to resolve such disagreements.  But what I found fascinating was how we both responded...
Read more

Naming things and Cunningham’s Law

Naming things is hard.  Naming things is very hard.  And, in software, we often want to name things when we know least about them. We create a variable that we plan to use later. What should it be called? How should it be used? We only have a vague plan at this point. And plans, of course, can change.  In my mob, we sometimes struggled to name things. And we would then fall into long discussions about what to call a variable. This often felt like bike-shedding, but we wanted a good name, so we carried on talking.  Then one day, we came up with a new plan. If we couldn’t name something within ten seconds, the person at the keyboard would just hit the keys at random and produce a gibberish name.  We would then use this unpronounceable name in the code, and move on.  And, as we moved on, we would have to talk about the unpronounceable thing. So we call it by what is was doing, by how we were using it. And, often, the name would then become apparent.  By ...
Read more